What type of warning should be issued prior to control using UOF?

Issuing a verbal warning prior to the use of force (UOF) aligns with protocols designed to prioritize de-escalation and communication in potentially volatile situations. A verbal warning allows personnel to clearly communicate their intentions to the individual involved, giving them the opportunity to comply with the instructions being conveyed. This approach also serves to document the attempt at resolution before resorting to force, establishing that all reasonable efforts were made to resolve the situation peacefully.

In contexts where UOF is considered, it is critical to demonstrate that the use of force is a last resort after all other measures, including effective communication, have been utilized. A written warning may not provide immediate clarification in a fast-paced situation, while a final warning implies that there are no further options, potentially escalating tension. An immediate warning, on the other hand, lacks the nuance and clarity that a verbal exchange allows, as it might not provide the individual adequate notice of the consequences of non-compliance. Thus, a verbal warning is the most suitable choice for promoting safety and compliance prior to any use of force.