California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Question: 1 / 50

When is non-deadly force appropriate to use?

When an officer feels threatened

Whenever it is likely to gain compliance with unlawful order

When reasonably necessary to gain compliance with lawful order

Non-deadly force is appropriate to use when it is reasonably necessary to gain compliance with a lawful order. This approach aligns with established law enforcement protocols, emphasizing the importance of maintaining authority while ensuring the safety of both the officer and the individual involved. The context of lawful orders means that the use of force must always be justified within the framework of legality; any force applied must be proportionate to the situation at hand and aimed at achieving compliance without inflicting unnecessary harm. The focus on "reasonably necessary" highlights the need for officers to assess the situation critically, taking into account various factors such as the behavior of the person involved, the environment, and the potential risks. By adhering to this guideline, officers can effectively manage encounters in a way that ensures safety and respects the rights of individuals. The other choices, while they may contain elements that seem valid, do not align with the standard protocols and principles governing the use of force. For example, feeling threatened does not automatically justify the use of force if a lawful order can achieve the desired outcome without it. Additionally, using force to gain compliance with an unlawful order undermines the legal principles that officers are sworn to uphold. Lastly, the unarmed status of an offender does not inherently justify the use

If the offender is unarmed

Next

Report this question